the israeli settlement gambit
israeli forces have invited bids for the construction of over 1,200 housing units in the e1 settlement, a move that would link ma’ale adumim to east jerusalem and effectively sever the west bank. this construction plan, championed by finance minister bezalel smotrich, is occurring just months before the general election and has drawn near-universal condemnation. foreign ministers from egypt, indonesia, jordan, qatar, saudi arabia, and turkey have flatly rejected the plan, while fifteen european and north american leaders, including those from the uk, france, and germany, have condemned it. the us has not criticised e1 itself but did state its opposition to israel’s annexation of the west bank. the strategic take is that the israeli right-wing is leveraging global backlash to bolster its political standing. by pushing a settlement that is widely viewed as ending the two-state solution, they are forcing european allies to pick a side, likely accelerating the diplomatic isolation of israel.
israel’s war on journalists
the independent has published a year-long investigation into an israeli double-tap strike on nasser hospital in khan younis, gaza, during which journalist mariam abu dagga was killed while livestreaming. the strike, which occurred on august 25, 2025, followed the death of reuters cameraman hussam al-masri in a first strike. the reporting details the personal life of mariam, who chose to remain in gaza to document the conflict, contrasting sharply with the israeli government’s characterization of the event as a ‘tragic mishap.’ the attack occurred at a protected site under international law, with the committee to protect journalists noting that israel has killed more media workers than any other nation on record. the strategic implication is a chilling signal to international media. if protected sites and journalists are legitimate targets, the reporting of the war from within gaza becomes exponentially more dangerous, fundamentally altering the information landscape of the conflict.
u.s.-led peace board: an african deployment?
the united states is trying to build a ‘board of peace’ to enforce a fragile ceasefire in gaza. military officials from uganda and burundi visited israel last week to discuss deploying troops. uganda has finalized details after its parliament approved the troop contribution, with around 1,200 personnel committed. burundi appears intent on joining but has no final agreement. the plan is part of a broader international force aimed at enforcing the ceasefire, training police, and securing aid delivery. us president donald trump announced a deal for hamas to disarm and for israel to withdraw from gaza, though israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu has rejected it, stating israel will not withdraw from roughly 60% of gaza until hamas is disarmed. the strategic take is a fascinating geopolitical shift: the u.s. is attempting to internationalize the conflict by bringing in african nations, a move that could both force israel’s hand and complicate the political calculus of the war.
congo and rwanda: a fragile peace in the east
the democratic republic of the congo (drc) and the rwanda-backed m23 rebel group have agreed on a roadmap for peace talks under a us-brokered framework agreement signed in doha. the agreement was reached following five days of talks in switzerland and includes commitments to a standardised method for reporting ceasefire violations. however, the reporting indicates that fighting has continued. an m23 spokesman claimed drc forces launched air raids with kamikaze drones in minembwe, while un officials warned of further destabilisation due to the use of drones. this conflict is rich in minerals critical to global technology, and the involvement of rwanda and the us as mediators adds significant geopolitical complexity. the strategic implication is that while diplomatic progress is being made, the militarized reality on the ground is rapidly outpacing the talks, making the ceasefire fragile and the region a powder keg.